I think you will agree with me when I say that most humans are reincarnated as ticks, leeches, mosquitoes, black flies, bedbugs, tapeworms or worse. Animals without proper digestive systems, the very bottom of the food chain, those that produce the least. Foremost in the excess population of these useless bloodsuckers in terms of predatory, yet non-regulatory behaviour, the government. Proper carnivores serve to cull the populace of their prey, facilitating evolution and preserving resources. Parasites do little to harm their prey directly, since taking a toll on their food source is detrimental to their limited hunting ability. The damage they inflict is secondary, through disease, lower birth rates, harassment and fatigue. Too often the case with authority is the same, those that talk the most do the least, being so quick to judge all but themselves, and in so doing avoid judgement by hypocritically projecting their own faults on to others.  Rather than identifying actual problems with their surroundings and (themselves) working to eliminate these faults, authoritarian parasites thrive on pandemonium  by using it as an excuse for imposing an unwieldy form of order that only engenders more chaos. In this regard they resemble parasites, because they do not root out genetic defects in their prey and eliminate the less efficient from the gene pool, but rather latch on to the first source of nutrients they can find and milk for all it's worth.

For example, the FBI infiltrates largely peaceful political organizations, pressuring them into adopting extreme tactics, supplying them with the resources to carry out dangerous activities in order that the activists get charged with more serious crimes. By taking part in, planing, and implementing the worst imaginable protests these 'agent provocateurs' epitomize the parasitic hypocrisy characteristic of all governments.  Rather than protecting the general populace these operatives implement domestic terrorism with tax dollars. The ensuing paranoia stemming from corrupt government practices and counter-insurgency methodology drives the extremism further through divisive security culture and increasingly militant attitudes. These defense strategies fail to protect the identities of those involved, and the nature of the group, their intentions, innocent or otherwise, can be deduced (or induced) from their constituents convictions. In actuality, the security culture is a tool for easy classification of anti-establishment groups, making the age old tactic of 'divide and conquer' all the easier. By accusing another member of a cell of informing or collaboration, the agent provocateur can even make their own comrades into their executioners.